I certainly wouldn’t have read this book if it hadn’t been for the recommendation of the philosopher Bernardo Kastrup. Already the title may raise some eyebrows – Why an Afterlife Obviously Exists: A Thought Experiment and Realer Than Real Near-Death Experiences near-death experiences more real than real) –, and the cover is decidedly sweet.
The author proposes a thought experiment which can be summed up somewhat simply here by this:
Imagine a room designed by a team of brilliant scientists and infinitely funded by the ultra-rich. You see, the project is pharaonic. From this room, no one can enter without being invited. The input mode is secret, as is the output. It is impossible to circumvent the system. The piece is a technical masterpiece. It is also impossible to know who will be able to enter the room.
The selection is random, scientific. We do not omit any stratum of society, any region of the planet, and social status, any type of personality, healthy people, sick people, crazy people, poets, politicians, etc.
No one knows what’s in the room, not even the scientists. We don’t know if there really is anything. The content was designed by an artificial intelligence whose memory was subsequently erased (here, I extrapolate the example of the author). The AI had all the means to invent something (it’s pharaonic, I tell you).
The experience lasts for years. People come in, spend some time in the room, and are taken out. All they are asked to do next is to report what they saw. Note that there are four types of "visits."
People will say to me, all this is impossible. You are wrong; it is all in a thought experiment. Many discoveries have come out of such experiments. But anyway, back to our scientists and their rich sponsors.
The results are being collated as we go along. It appears that all of them, without exception but to varying degrees, report the same thing.
Our scientists are puzzled because they didn’t really expect this. There is no such thing as a pink elephant, and how come it has such an effect on people? Some people find something other than an elephant, and the more people you bring in, the more confusing it becomes, but by extrapolating the experiences, you can bring it down to constants.
You can probably guess the connection with the theme of the book.
The results are as follows and are of course graded by the magnitude of the experience:
The purpose of this book is not, despite the title which seems to say otherwise, to prove that life after death exists, as near-death experiences raise more questions than answers. The author suggests that it would not be at all irrational to listen to what these people have to say, since their testimonies point in the same direction.
The book reads well, the tone is calm, without artifice. The man is a philosopher and invites us to listen.
Those who come back from such experiences probably have to filter the wide range of their experiences with the ignorance attached to their words. It seems that many remain silent because they cannot express what they have experienced or because they are laughed at.
I want to hear these people. But I feel like Job and I’m already complaining. Why should this exist? Why must we suffer, enjoy, cry, and laugh in this world if it is to return in the end to a universe more wonderful than all paradises? Why this cycle, this fall and rise? Too much happiness up there, it’s boring? Many religions have tried to formulate explanations that always break on the rock of ultimate incomprehension.
And the fly that I just knocked out to the point that its little heart stopped for a while before starting to beat again, what did it experience? The same light?